Why Women Should Not be Allowed in Active Combat Duty Essay

Why Women Should Not be Allowed in Active Combat Duty - Essay ExampleThey are admirable in the route they acquit themselves in times of conflict and split second decision making and maybe, just maybe -- we might even have a feminine president some day. Women still have lofty ambitions when it comes to more things that they hope to do in terms of anthropoid equality and, along with the presidency, fighting on board men in progressive combat is still one glass ceiling they can non break. Although there already exists cracks in that particular ceiling, I do not believe that women should ever be all(prenominal)owed to see active combat for a number of valid reasons. There are two main reasons that women should not be stoped in combat according to Robert Bork (qtd. in Sowin). Those reasons are 1. Putting women in combat is crucial to womens self-esteem and to mens respect for women. (That has neer been true in the past and it is impossible to see why it should be true now.) 2. Comb at roles are important to military advancement. The above arguments are all based upon the way that women are traditionally viewed in our society. Womens rights activists protest the idealization of the female role in society because it makes them seem like fragile, emotionally light-colored people who do not have any desire or capability to defend themselves or others. By joining the military and joining active combat, women feel that they are an equally strong sex and are capable of fighting the good fight also. This is one case wherein the intentions may be sound, exactly the execution will always be weak. The reality of women in the military is that they are given preference and leeway in intimately streneous and taxing activities because women do not have the same stamina as men. In fact, women who train in West Point and other military institutions are not make to compete against other men or by male standards, they are only measured in terms of capabilty against other wome n. This can prove to be detrimental on the battlefield where they fight alongside men who are faster and stronger but are then held back in order to allow the women to catch up. (Sowin Why Women Should Not Be Allowed in Combat). Gender norming and lowering the pedagogy standards in order to allow women to pass is a disservice to our piece class soldiers who are expected to lead on the battlefield. Women are still thought of all over the world, most specially in the Muslim territories as being weak and dependent on the male species. Majority of the modern women have managed to change that idea by proving that they can be emotionally and somaticly strong in various ways. I take my hats off to those women. However, fighting in an active battlefront requires much more than just marathon training and endurance tests. There are those who take on the point of view that Women are not suited by temperament or by physical characteristics for the highly aggressive, ultra-violent pursuit of victory in battle. Much of an armys success depends upon intimidation of the enemy. A force composed of women is far less fright than one consisting of macho men. Intimidation of the enemy saves proceeds in wartime. (Women Should Not Be Allowed in Military Combat). Consider if you will, that the enemies of our nation field burly, scary, and brainwashed men into battle. They live to intimidate the weak. The simple glare of of their eyes, flare of the nostrils, or clearing of the throat is designed to instill fear into any enemy be he male or female. Fighting a war does not allow for segregation of the sexes in order to effectively fight the battle. It is man vs. woman in most cases and, no matter what Hollywood says about G.I. Jane, a woman can easily be taken down by a well educate and strength enhanced enemy. This will then pose a problem for the team who will