The Criticisms of Kohlbergs Moral Development Stages Essay -- Moral D

The Criticisms of Kohlbergs Moral Development StagesPart OneThe literary criticisms of Kohlbergs righteous development breaker points come out to center around three major points, his inquiry rules, the regression of stage four, and fin solelyy his goals.The first criticism that I would like to address is that of his research methods. Kohlberg is often criticized for not only his subject selection, but also the methods by which he tries to extricate data from those subjects. His initial study consisted of school boys from a private institution in Chicago. The problem with this is fairly obvious, that this does not give a significant portion of the population to allow for generalized conclusions. In other words, how can we test some boys from Chicago and ascertain that this is how all tribe develop mankindwide?I believe that the answer to this criticism comes from the theory that it relates to. Kohlbergs moral development schema is highly dependent upon the intellection that there are fundamental truths that cannot be dismissed. These ideas are in the ethoxyethane, wound into the very fabric that constructs human nature. Granted, his descriptions of the various stages also come out very dependent upon the surroundings and social institutions that an individual would be subjected to. until now these institutions would be have to be built upon people, all of whom would share these ideologic truths. It seems fairly obvious that all people have undeniable needs, survival of the fittest and some group membership. Kohlbergs stages are merely methods by which one could satisfy these needs. For instance, Spartan societies were adamant about maintaining the purity and strength of the civilization. Citizens saw no wrong in exposing a sick or lame muff to the elements so that it might die. Surely an act of cruelty today, but in that society, a necessary evil The prosperity and wealth of the whole was of great importance than that of the individual.In additi on to these justifications, additional research substantiated Kohlbergs claims. Different subjects were tested, from all ages and regions, and the like conclusions were drawn from the data. Assuming that these conclusions are correct, and the data leads to the same interpretation, is there each other possibility? This argument seems most impressive, especially considering the differences between people that are evident in everyday life. Similarities ... ...o a small agree to fit their needs. In conclusion, it seems that there is definitely a way to intermix the Kohlberg justice theme and the Gilligan caring theme of moral development. Mr. Kohlberg provides a method to police a society that does not include 100 portion utopian citizens. Ms. Gilligan gives us the ability to relate to each and every person, as a person. She indicates ways that we can identify with their perspectives, understand their needs, and compromise. Although the real world seems infinitely more complex tha n either of these postures, they bear a scare resemblance to real societies and real people. Maybe someday, a perfect model will be constructed, judged by a perfect path of moral development. Until then, I hope that I have found a healthy combination of these two ideas. One last side note I think I could spend weeks typing a paper on this subject. There are thousands of facets of each system that could fit into the others potential flaws. However, I think Ive been long-winded enough as it is. I have assay to make my points as succinct and reasonable as possible, but without sacrificing incisively what I wanted to say. Thank you for your patience.