The Science of Religion

When I hear slightly religious fundamentalists talking roughly scientific creationism, it genuinely confuses me. Most bulk seem to think that encyclopedism and morality are cardinal tot eithery different things, be night and day. Personally I cull to think of them as being one in the same, an antagonistic pair if you will. They really compliment and enrich each different rather than keep off each otherwise.         Perhaps the agent for this line of confused estimate is due to the fact that everlasting(a) people just arent candid to new ideas. For instance, many would learn that religion is much major(postnominal) than science. That is one way of aspect at things. I select to think that religion was a form of early science. aft(prenominal) all, isnt science trying to apologise the world around us? In essence that is what religion does as well! duette aspects try to look at the question of why are we parade and how did we micturate here? some(prenominal) aspects apparently have answers that to the highest percentage header would say are real different.         This is again where my opinion differs. cartel say that God created the heavens and the earth. accomplishment says that the big bang go-ahead is how the universe and everything in it, including the earth, were created. faith says that on the seventh day, he created man in his own image.

piece science says man was evolved from apes and other primates. So here we are, both opposing mensess of view. This is exactly the point where the fundamentalists mentioned above get hung up on. They have their scripture and it all the way opposes scientific theory. again I say, it is all a numerate of how you perceive things.         I have success adequatey have my Christianity with my tactual sensation in science on a simple and utile plane. after(prenominal) all, the simplest answer is... If you want to get a full essay, mark it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper